Exploring Effective 1:1 Consultations: Core Competencies, Themes, Attributes, and Values
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26473/ATLAANZ.2025.1/006Keywords:
core competencies model, tertiary learning advising, professional practice, individual consultations, 1:1 consultations, one-to-one consultationsAbstract
This article examines the competencies and practices that underpin effective individual consultations (ICs), contributing to the evolving professionalisation of tertiary learning advising in Aotearoa New Zealand. Responding to Malik’s (2021) invitation to co-construct a national core competencies model, it focuses on Core Competency #3: “Plan and conduct successful advising interactions in one-to-one … settings.” Drawing on an autoethnographic methodology which foregrounds practitioner reflection, the article reflects on three consultations with undergraduate students at Auckland University of Technology (AUT), each involving the use of asynchronous academic literacy resources.
The article argues that ICs should be understood not as remedial or transactional encounters, but as pedagogical spaces that require clearly articulated professional competencies. It explores how Tertiary Learning Advisors (TLAs) integrate institutional tools, respond to diverse learner needs, and foster student agency. The vignettes illustrate challenges related to unfamiliarity with assignment types, academic integrity, and neurodiversity; discussion of each vignette highlights the transformative potential of relational advising and digital resource integration.
By identifying salient themes, attributes, and values relating to ICs, this study contributes to the co-construction of a national competencies framework that reflects the full scope of TLA practice: pedagogically grounded, institutionally aware, and committed to inclusive, student-centred learning.
References
Ako Aotearoa. (2025). A comprehensive guide to Universal Design for Learning (UDL). https://info.ako.ac.nz/ako-aotearoa-blog/guide-to-udl
Association of Tertiary Learning Advisors of Aotearoa/New Zealand. (2012). ATLAANZ professional practice document. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CnutqWANMvvvIMZT4mTUDyeQvaieVoQZ/view
Association of Tertiary Learning Advisors of Aotearoa New Zealand. (2022). Professional accreditation. ATLAANZ. https://www.atlaanz.org/accreditation/
Auckland University of Technology. (n.d.). Support services. https://www.aut.ac.nz/student-life/support-services
Bak, T. (2025). Exploring the contemplative: A meditative self-inquiry of individual consultations practice. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 19(1), 102–122. https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/989
Bak, T., & Grossi, V. (2025). Editorial: Special issue on individual consultations and academic language and learning practice. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 19(1), E1–E4. https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/999
Bassett, M. (2025). Learning advisors should be doing individual consultations differently: Why is that and what should we be doing instead? ATLAANZ Journal, 8(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.26473/ATLAANZ.2025.1/004
Bassett, M., Chapman, E., & Wattam, C. (2023). ‘I don’t know the hierarchy’: Using UX to position literacy development resources where students expect them. In T. Cochrane, V. Narayan, C. Brown, K. MacCallum, E. Bone, C. Deneen, R. Vanderburg, & B. Hurren (Eds.), People, partnerships and pedagogies. Proceedings ASCILITE 2023. Christchurch (pp. 286–290). https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2023.462
Biggs, J. (2014). Constructive alignment in university teaching. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 1, 5–22. https://herdsa.org.au/herdsa-review-higher-education-vol-1/5-22
Burgess, A., & Ivanič, R. (2010). Writing and being written: Issues of identity across timescales. Written Communication, 27(2), 228–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088310363447
Cameron, C. (2018a). Tertiary learning advisors in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Part One: Building a profile of our profession. ATLAANZ Journal, 3(Special Issue: Identity and Opportunity), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.26473/ATLAANZ.2018.1/002
Cameron, C. (2018b). Tertiary learning advisors in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Part Two: Acknowledging our contribution. ATLAANZ Journal, 3 (Special Issue: Identity and Opportunity): 25–43. https://doi.org/10.26473/ATLAANZ.2018.1/003
Campitelli, S. T., Page, J. M., & Quach, J. L. (2019). Measuring the effectiveness of academic skills individual interventions on university graduate student writing: To what extent are we making a difference? Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 13(1), A124–A139. https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/601
Carless, D., & Chan, K. H. (2016). Managing dialogic use of exemplars. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1211246
Carter, S. (2010). The shifting sands of tertiary individual consultation. In V. van der Ham, L. Sevillano, & L. George (Eds.), Shifting sands, firm foundations: Proceedings of the 2009 Annual International Conference of the Association of Tertiary Learning Advisors of Aotearoa/New Zealand (ATLAANZ) (pp. 72–83). ATLAANZ. https://atlaanz.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Carter2010a.pdf
CAST. (2024). Universal Design for Learning guidelines version 3.0. https://udlguidelines.cast.org
Chang, H. (2008). Autoethnography as method. Taylor & Francis.
Chanock, K. (2007). What academic language and learning advisers bring to the scholarship of teaching and learning: Problems and possibilities for dialogue with the disciplines. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(3), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701494294
Chanock, K., Ivancevic, K., Price, K., & van Commeneé, W. A. (2025). Student reflections on enabling success and overcoming barriers. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 19(1), 1–4. https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/1011
Charlton, N., & Martin, A. (2018). Making the invisible visible. Journal of Academic Language and Learning,12(1), 286–300. https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/540
Chu, C., Abella, I. S., & Paurini, S. (2013). Educational practices that benefit Pacific learners in tertiary education. Ako Aotearoa, National Centre for Tertiary Teaching Excellence. https://ako.ac.nz/knowledge-centre/pasifika-learner-success-tertiary-education/educational-practices-that-benefit-pacific-learners-in-tertiary-education
Clarence, S., & McKenna, S. (2017). Developing academic literacies through understanding the nature of disciplinary knowledge. London Review of Education, 15(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.15.1.04
Coffin, C., & Donohue, J. (2012). Academic literacies and systemic functional linguistics: How do they relate? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.004
Eaton, S. E. (2024). Comprehensive academic integrity (CAI): An ethical framework for educational contexts. In S. E. Eaton (Ed.), Second handbook of academic integrity (pp. 1–14). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_194
Foronda, C., Smith, L., Murray, J., & Domdom, J. (2025). Four first in family students’ transition into degree study at a vocational education institution. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 60(1), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-024-00375-x
French, A. (2016). ‘Fail better’: Reconsidering the role of struggle and failure in academic writing development in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(4), 408–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1251848
Gurney, L., & Grossi, V. (2023). Supporting student wellbeing as an academic language and learning advisor: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(6). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.6.18
Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2007). Heutagogy: A child of complexity theory. Complexity, 4(1), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.29173/cmplct8766
Hawe, E., Lightfoot, U., & Dixon, H. (2017). First-year students working with exemplars: Promoting self-efficacy, self-monitoring, and self-regulation. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1349894
Haggis, T. (2006). Pedagogies for diversity: Retaining critical challenge amidst fears of “dumbing down.” Studies in Higher Education, 31(5), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600922709
Halliday, M. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.
Hamilton, J., & Bak, T. (2025). Helping students see the throughline: Exploring the affective dimensions of individual consultations. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 19(1), 21–36. https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/983
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hyland, K. (2007). Genre and academic writing in the disciplines. Pearson Education.
Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2024). Google Gemini as a next generation AI educational tool: A review of emerging educational technology. Smart Learning Environments 11(22). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00310-z
Keesing-Styles, L. (2023). Ako explored: Evidence-based learning and teaching practices that enhance quality of outcomes in tertiary education in Aotearoa. Ako Aotearoa. https://ako.ac.nz/assets/Knowledge-centre/Ako-Explored/Ako-Explored-WEB.pdf
Kelly, A., Strampel, K., & Lynch, A. (2024). Reconceptualising the role of academic language and learning advisers in the artificial intelligence age. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.53761/7vvt5q37
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001) Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Arnold.
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364
Lea, M., & Street, B. (2006). The "academic literacies" model: Theory and applications. Theory into Practice, 45(4), 368–377. http://oro.open.ac.uk/21057/
Lillis, T., & Scott, M. (2007). Defining academic literacies research: Issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 5–32. http://oro.open.ac.uk/17057/
Macnaught, L. (2020). Demystifying reflective writing in teacher education with semantic gravity. In C. Windburg, S. McKenna, & K. Wilmot (Eds.), Building knowledge in higher education: Enhancing teaching and learning with legitimation code theory (pp. 19–26). Routledge.
Magyar, A. E. (2012). Plagiarism and attribution: An academic literacies approach? Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 4, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i4.141
Malik, M. (2021). Core competencies for the practice of tertiary learning advising in New Zealand. ATLAANZ Journal, 5(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.26473/ATLAANZ.2021/005
Maton, K. (2013). Making semantic waves: A key to cumulative knowledge-building. Linguistics and Education, 24(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2012.11.005
Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal Design for Learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practicing within the disciplines. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: Theory and practice ten years on (pp. 412–424). Oxford Brookes University.
Mollick, E. R., & Mollick, L. (2023, March 17). Using AI to implement effective teaching strategies in classrooms: Five strategies, including prompts. Available at SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4391243
Mortimore, T., & Crozier, W. R. (2006). Dyslexia and difficulties with study skills in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572173
NACADA: The Global Community for Academic Advising. (2006). NACADA concept of academic advising. https://nacada.ksu.edu/Resources/Pillars/Concept.aspx
NACADA: The Global Community for Academic Advising. (2024). NACADA academic advising core competencies model. https://www.nacada.ksu.edu/Resources/Pillars/CoreCompetencies.aspx
Nosrati, V., Grossi, V., Fraser, T., & Wright-Neville, C. (2025). Understanding individual consultations (ICs): Insights from academic language and learning advisers’ perspectives. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 19(1), 84–101. https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/987
Pino, M., & Mortari, L. (2014). The inclusion of students with dyslexia in higher education: A systematic review using narrative synthesis. Dyslexia, 20(4), 346–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1484
Raleigh, S., McWilliams, R., & Allan, Q. (2024). #Take5 #101 Collaborating to embed academic literacies: Enhancing our best practice model. Association for Learning Development in Higher Education. Retrieved from https://aldinhe.ac.uk/take5-101-collaborating-to-embed-academic-literacies-enhancing-our-best-practice-model/
Rose, D. H., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Equinox Publishing.
Rowland, D. R. (2023). Two frameworks to guide discussions around levels of acceptable use of generative AI in student academic research and writing. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 17(1), T31–T69. https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/915
Russell, D. R., Lea, M., Parker, J., Street, B., & Donahue, T. (2009). Exploring notions of genre in ‘academic literacies’ and ‘writing across the curriculum’: Approaches across countries and contexts. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world: Perspectives on writing (pp. 395–423). WAC Clearinghouse/Parlor Press.
Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Otago University Press.
Sotardi, V. A., & Friesen, M. D. (2017). Student reflections on learning and studying during the transition to university: Implications for tertiary learning advisors. ATLAANZ Journal, 2(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.26473/ATLAANZ.2017.2.1/002
Stephens, J. M., Absolum, K., Adam, L. A., Blickem, C. J., Gilliver-Brown, K. E., Hart, D. E., Kelly, J., Olsen, W., & Ulrich, N. (2024). Academic misconduct among undergraduates across Aotearoa: Insights and implications for policy and practice. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 59, 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-024-00315-9
Stevenson, M. D., & Kokkinn, B. A. (2009). Evaluating one-to-one sessions of academic language and learning. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 3(2), A36–A50. https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/86
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency [Australia]. (2020). Good practice note on improving retention and completion of students (Version 2.0). https://www.teqsa.gov.au/sites/default/files/good-practice-note-improving-retention-completion-students-v2-0.pdf
Te Puni Kōkiri. (2018). Māori perspectives on education and the Treaty of Waitangi. Te Puni Kōkiri. https://www.tpk.govt.nz/en
United Kingdom Advising and Tutoring. (2019). Professional framework for advising and tutoring. UKAT. https://www.ukat.uk/standards/professional-framework-for-advising-and-tutoring
van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. University of Chicago Press.
Wingate, U., & Tribble, C. (2012). The best of both worlds? Towards an English for Academic Purposes/academic literacies writing pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 37(4), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.525630
Winstone, N., & Carless, D. (2019). Designing effective feedback processes in higher education: A learning-focused approach (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351115940
Yazan, B. (2024). Autoethnography in language education research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57464-1
Zhan, Y., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Yan, Z. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence as an enabler of student feedback engagement: A framework. Higher Education Research & Development, 44(5), 1289–1304. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2025.2476513
