Collaboration between teachers and learning advisors to improve learner outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26473/ATLAANZ.2023/008Abstract
Qualitative research conducted at Toi Ohomai Institute of Technology investigated how kaiako (teachers) have been interacting with learning advisors (LAs) and how they would like to engage with them to capitalise on their specialist skills to improve student outcomes. The research consisted of semi-structured interviews with 15 teachers from six campuses in the region, from a variety of teaching contexts including on-campus, online/distance, and mixed-mode learning. Teachers in a wide variety of subject areas were chosen to ascertain if there are different needs in any of those areas. The teachers were interviewed either in person or using Teams Meet software. Voice or video recordings were made and used for analysis and discussion. The results were tabulated and discussed by a panel of LAs to find important implications of the study. The research determined that the experiences of teachers with LAs are widely varied across the institute depending on factors such as geography, teaching styles, course duration, teacher and academic leader introductions to services, and other factors. All interviewees saw the value of LAs but many were uncertain about how to engage with them and collaborate effectively at a classroom level. Where engagement exists at a classroom level, teachers are most satisfied with LA outcomes. The research indicates that closer collaboration can be achieved by increasing LA involvement in the classroom environment, particularly in areas identified as high needs. Critical to this collaboration is teachers’ facilitating contact with LAs in the classroom. This collaboration will help identify student needs to enable timely interventions.
References
Acheson, C. (2006). Finding evidence that learning support makes a difference. In G. Grigg, & C. Bond (Eds.), Supporting learning in the 21st century: Refereed proceedings of the 2005 Association of Tertiary Learning Advisors of Aotearoa New Zealand Conference (pp. 222–228). ATLAANZ.
Bishop, R., Ladwig J., & Berryman M. (2014). The centrality of relationships for pedagogy: The whanaungatanga thesis. American Educational Research Journal, 51(1) 184–214. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213510019
Breen, F., & Protheroe, M. (2015). Are students and learning advisors connecting? Does our practice affect student retention and success? Association of Tertiary Learning Advisors Aotearoa New Zealand Journal, 1(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.26473/ATLAANZ.2015.1.1/005
Cousin, G., & Deepwell, F. (2005). Designs for network learning: A community of practice perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 30(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507052000307795
El Zaatari, W., & Maalouf, I. (2022). How the Bronfenbrenner bio-ecological system theory explains the development of students’ sense of belonging to school? SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221134089
Ernst, J., & Erickson, D. M. (2018). Environmental education professional development for teachers: A study of the impact and influence of mentoring. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49(5) 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2018.1451813
Henning, M., & Manalo, E. (2012). Motivation to learn, self-regulation and academic achievement: How effective are study skills programmes? In J. N. Franco, & A. E. Svensgaard (Eds.), Handbook on psychology of motivation: New research (pp. 209–226). Nova Publications. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282916250_Motivation_to_learn_self-regulation_and_academic_achievement_How_effective_are_study_skills_programmes
Lear, E., & Prentice, S. (2010). On the road to success: Toward retention best practice. In J. Batchelor, & L. Roche (Eds.), Student success and retention: Sharing and evaluating best practice: Proceedings of the 2010 Annual International Conference of the Association of Tertiary Learning Advisors of Aotearoa/New Zealand (pp. 24–36). ATLAANZ. https://atlaanz.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Lear-Prentice-2011.pdf
Manalo, E., Marshall, J., & Fraser, C. (Eds.). (2010). Student learning support programmes that demonstrate tangible impact on retention, pass rates & completion (2nd ed.). Ako Aotearoa. https://ako.ac.nz/assets/Knowledge-centre/RHPF-N22-Student-Support-Programmes-that-impact-on-retention/Student-Learning-Support-Programmes-that-demonstrate-impact-on-Retention-and-completion.pdf
Rivers, J. (Ed.). (2005). Supporting students in tertiary study: A summary of a synthesis of research on the impact of student support services on student outcomes in undergraduate tertiary study. Ministry of Education.
https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/7320/student-support-summary.pdf
Scott, G. (2008). Review of Australian higher education request for research and analysis: University student engagement and satisfaction with learning and teaching. University of Western Sydney. https://www.westernsydney.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/78668/Research_HE_review_0908_Scott.pdf
Simpson, O. (2005). The costs and benefits of student retention for students, institutions, and governments. Studies in Learning, Evaluation, Innovation, and Development, 2(3), 34–53. https://oro.open.ac.uk/6761/
Smith, G. (2017, March 19). Whanaungatanga: What is it? How can you use it to create learner success? Thisisgraeme. https://thisisgraeme.me/2017/03/09/what-is-whanaungatanga/#:~:text=In%20the%20context%20of%20education,are%20characterised%20by%20certain%20expectations
Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=c1f9febe8e43d6eb0f82f9c2efdfb607efe262fe
Viskovic, A. (2007). Becoming a tertiary teacher: Learning in communities of practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(4) 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360600947285
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(6), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023947624004