Thinking of doing a doctorate?
Reflections from a tertiary learning advisor perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26473/ATLAANZ.2021/004Keywords:
Tertiary learning advisor, TLA, doctoral study, doctorate, PhD, autoethnographyAbstract
This article considers the desirability of the doctorate for a tertiary learning advisor (TLA), explains the process and experience of doctoral study, and affirms how doctoral study can enhance the effectiveness of a TLA in developing students’ academic literacies. Effectiveness relates not only to the pedagogical relationship between a TLA and students, but to enhanced visibility and credibility of the TLA and their team within their institution. But what is the doctoral journey actually like? This article will be of interest to curious individuals who may have wondered what the doctorate involves in terms of time and commitment, and whether the benefits outweigh the costs. This article seeks to demystify the process and encourage neophyte researchers who may be considering a qualitative project. Using an autoethnography approach, I take as a case study my own doctoral journey, touching on my initial motivation and sharing candid insights on the challenges and milestones as I perceived them. These insights are shared through a series of brief narratives and reflections, with practical advice offered for each stage of the journey.
References
Allan, Q. (1994). A study of the delexical verbs ‘give’, ‘have’, ‘make’ and ‘take’ from a corpus of academic texts [MA thesis]. University of Birmingham.
Allan, Q. (2017). Gay men coming out later in life: A phenomenological inquiry into disclosing sexual orientation in Aotearoa New Zealand [PhD thesis]. Institute of Public Policy, Auckland University of Technology. http://aut.researchgateway.ac.nz/handle/10292/11004
Allan, Q. (2021). Rite of passage: Your oral examination. In M. Waring & K. Kearins (Eds.), Thesis survivor stories: Practical advice on getting through your PhD or Masters thesis (2nd ed.). Bridget Williams Books.
Cahusac de Caux, B. (2021). Doctoral candidates’ academic writing output and strategies: Navigating the challenges of academic writing during a global health crisis. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 16, 291-317. https://doi.org/10.28945/4755
Cameron, C. (2018). Tertiary learning advisors in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Part one: Building a profile of our profession. ATLAANZ Journal, 3(Special Issue: Identify and Opportunity). https://journal.atlaanz.org/index.php/ATLAANZ/issue/view/4
Carter, S. & Laurs, D. (2014). Developing generic support for doctoral students: Practice and pedagogy. Taylor & Francis Group.
Carter, S., & Laurs, D. (2018). Developing research writing: A handbook for supervisors and advisors. Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/AUT/detail.action?docID=4941868
Carruth, G. D. (2015). Doctoral student attrition: A problem for higher education. The Journal of Educational Thought (JET) / Revue de la Pensée Éducative, 48(3), 189. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24894120
Clough, P. & Nutbrown, C. (2012). A student's guide to methodology: Justifying enquiry. Sage.
Coelho, P. (2004). The alchemist. Harper Collins.
Coney, S. (1988). The unfortunate experiment. Penguin Books.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Allen & Unwin.
Davis, L. M., Tumursukh, U., & Allan, Q. (2021). Truth about researching truth. In M. Waring & K. Kearins (Eds.), Thesis survivor stories: Practical advice on getting through your PhD or Masters thesis (2nd ed.). Bridget Williams Books.
Denholm, C., & Evans, T. (Eds.). (2006). Doctorates downunder: Keys to successful doctoral study in Australia and New Zealand. ACER Press.
Denholm, C., & Evans, T. (Eds.). (2007). Supervising doctorates downunder: Keys to effective supervision in Australia and New Zealand. ACER Press.
Discover PhDs. (n.d.). PhD failure rate: A study of 26,076 PhD candidates. https://www.discoverphds.com/advice/doing/phd-failure-rate
Engels-Schwarzpaul, T., & Peters, M. (Eds.) (2013). Of other thoughts: Non-traditional ways to the doctorate: A guidebook for candidates and supervisors. Sense Publishers.
Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 36(4), 273-290. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23032294
Feyerabend, P. (1993). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. Verso.
Frick, B. L., & Brodin, E. M. (2020). A return to Wonderland: Exploring the links between academic identity development and creativity during doctoral education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(2), 209-219. https://doi-org.ezproxy.aut.ac.nz/10.1080/14703297.2019.1617183
Gadamer, H.-G. (1975/2013). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. Marshall, Trans.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Grant, B. M., & Giddings, L. S. (2002). Making sense of methodologies: A paradigm framework for the novice researcher. Contemporary Nurse, 13(1), 10-28.
Hart, C. (2001). Doing a literature search: A comprehensive guide for the social sciences. Sage Publications.
Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. Sage Publications.
Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Hawley, P. (2003). Being bright is not enough: The unwritten rules of doctoral study. C.C. Thomas.
Heidegger, M. (1953/2010). Being and time (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). State University of New York Press.
Hutching, M. (2004). The distance between voice and transcript. In A. Green & M. Hutching (Eds.), Remembering: Writing oral history (pp. 168-177). Auckland University Press.
Kelly, F. J. (2017). The Idea of the PhD: The doctorate in the twenty-first-century imagination. Taylor & Francis Group.
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. The University of Chicago Press.
Laurs, D. (2018). The role of tertiary learning advisors in successful doctoral completion. In S. Carter & D. Laurs (Eds.), Developing research writing: A handbook for supervisors and advisors (pp. 43-45). Routledge.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Leshem, S. (2020). Identity formations of doctoral students on the route to achieving their doctorate. Issues in Educational Research, 30(1), 169-186. http://www.iier.org.au/iier30/leshem.pdf
Manalo, E., & Trafford, J. (2004). Thinking to thesis: A guide to graduate success at all levels. Pearson Longman.
Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books.
Tinkler, P., & Jackson, C. (2004). The doctoral examination process: A handbook for students, examiners and supervisors. Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Left Coast Press, Inc.
Waring, M., & Kearins, K. (2011). Thesis survivor stories: Practical advice for getting through your PhD or Masters thesis. AUT Media.
Waring, M., & Kearins, K. (Eds.). (2021). Thesis survivor stories: Practical advice on getting through your PhD or Masters thesis (2nd ed.). Bridget Williams Books.
Wisker, G. (2012). The good supervisor: Supervising postgraduate and undergraduate research for doctoral theses and dissertations. Palgrave Macmillan.
